Do n’t you detest it when you do like one major , nearly ruinous screw - up and no one lets you forget it ? For AMD that colossal fuckery was the launching of the Bulldozer chipset in 2011 . 8 years by and by AMD has been hit with a $ 12 million mulct related to false advertising around Bulldozer , and hr after the amercement was issued it ’s now reportedly made some less than accurate performance title about a much newer chipset .
Wccftech first notedthat AMDreleased a videothis workweek that claim its new Ryzen Pro can hit clock speeds of 5Ghz . That ’s impressive as 5Ghz is a major bench mark that few CPU can hit . The Ryzen Pro series of processors are none of those mainframe . As observe onAMD ’s own websitethe max clock f number for a Ryzen Pro processor is 4.1Ghz .
https://gizmodo.com/inside-amds-quest-to-build-chips-that-can-beat-intel-1824064984
Photo: Alex Cranz (Gizmodo)
The title in the AMD picture is likely a typographical error ( we ’ve reached out to AMD for input and will update as soon as we hear back ) . Typos are n’t news ! Unless they are beautifully - timed typos .
This one utterly is .
Yesterday , as noted bythe Register , AMD hold to pay out approximately $ 12 million dollar to plaintiffs in a class - action cause for make faux claim in advertizement and selling materials relate to its Bulldozer CPUs that were launched back in 2011 . Those chips , as we ’ve noted previously , were establish to be swelled beefy processors capable of 5Ghz clock speeds . They did not come even close to that kind of functioning .
The claims that grow AMD in hot H2O were n’t really refer to clock speed though . or else , with Bulldozer , AMD had a spoiled habit of exact it was shipping 8 - gist CPUs , many masses , including the claimants that launched a class activity in California in 2015 , disagreed . AMD believe that its chip marketed as 8 - nitty-gritty CPUs counted because they were made of 4 independent modules , but each module had two cores .
The claimants disagreed , observe that each faculty shared resource that would efficaciously restrain the crisp . So it might have looked like an 8 - core CPU but it performed like something much less herculean .
The Bulldozer bit , as we ’ve chronicled extensively , were a major failure for AMD and ruined the competitive marketplace for CPUs appearing in consumer information processing system . It would be another six years before AMD started competing with Intel in any in truth noted manner .
Ryzen is a very different story from Bulldozer , and , to escort , there have been no concerns about the numeral of cores being report by AMD being different than the number of cores in the actual processor . So if you have a Ryzen Pro central processing unit you should be prosperous in the noesis that it really has the figure of CPUs noted on the loge . Just do n’t expect it to ever hit the legendary 5Ghz clock speed .
As for Bulldozer owners curious about go in on that class action at law case . It ’s gestate that every claimant should get approximately $ 35 provided they can prove ownership of the affected devices . Right now it will only compensate owners who occupy in California at the time of leverage and own one of the follow central processing unit :
FX-8120
FX-8150
FX-8320
FX-8350
FX-8370
FX-9370
FX-9590
AMD and the courts are still finalise the payout , but keep your eye disrobe in October for more data .
Update 8/30 3:57pm ET
AMD make Gizmodo the following assertion bear on to the TV above :
We have revised one of our latest “ Why Use AMD Ryzen PRO processors for Business”videosto intimately illustrate the benefit of Ryzen PRO processors and plow any confusions the animations may have caused .
Ryzen
Daily Newsletter
Get the secure tech , science , and culture news in your inbox daily .
News from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
