Everyday it feels like scientific discipline fiction and realism coast ever closer together . In the late variation of “ could this hap , ” scientist have published a new work that weighs building massive shoulder to protect lose Antarctic glaciers .
The results focus on one of the most at - jeopardy glaciers ring Antarctica , and show that we could indeed save it with a braggy enough berm . Now , we just need to figure out how to build up the berms , if we can economize other glaciers , who make up one’s mind if this is a good idea , who pays for it , and if it ’s worth the cost . No handsome deal .
Geoengineering is a catch pocketbook of technological mood extenuation strategy that tend to be controversial , in part because they could wildly screw up the planet . The most often - talk over thought involves hack the whole planet byshielding it from the Sunday , which would cool down things down while humanity gets its shit together when it comes to carbon paper pollution . But while that idea could really mess up up rainfall patterns and have a host of other adverse consequences , hacking the Antarctic is a moment different .

This more targeted geoengineering scheme would strike only glacier , which the newfangled study ’s author Michael Wolovick called “ very high - leverage point . ” This is n’t to say it ’s a perfect plan , but it is an intriguing conception in a rapidly exposit suite of proposals on how to slack down clime change .
The subject field , bring out on Thursdayin the Cryosphere , looks at how we could protect Thwaites Glacier from runaway melt . That glacier is part of the West Antarctic area that ’s in serious fuss due to strong H2O undercutting the chalk shelves that reach out out over the ocean . The basics in this area slopes downward as it move inland , meaning the front face of the glacier is turn ever tall , increasing the risk of infection of instability . The region may already be in a phase of unstoppable melting that could lead inmany feet of ocean level cost increase .
“ The social consequence of rapid sea stage hike are enormous , ” Wolovick , a investigator Princeton , tell Earther in an e-mail . “ Even a meter of rise would ask society to pass X of billions of dollars per year shoring up coastal defenses like butch , levees , etc … Yet a cadence of sea layer acclivity is relatively small liken to what the ice sheets are equal to of . ”

In the face of this meltdown , agroup of scientiststhat let in Wolovick have antecedently pop the question build Brobdingnagian underwater shoulder to help shore up up glacier and cut off the flow of strong water . That could allow them time to grow back and toughen up . The new analysis look at what the success charge per unit of steady the ice would be under dissimilar types of protective cover . In one scenario , they looked at “ isolated pinning points , ” which would n’t stymy any of the warm water but would help give the glacier something to hang onto while in the other scenarios , they looked at diminished berm that stuff half and all of the water as well as a very tall shoulder to block it all further from the glacier itself .
Perhaps not surprising , the last iteration was most in effect according to their model pretending , preserving the glacier 100 percent of the time . But even the separated shoulder were still effective in 30 percent of their modeling runs under a around patronage - as - usual warming scenario . And those berms are within range of current human capability . The study points to China ’s South – North Water Transfer Project as require a similar amount of dig . The bigger berms are an order of magnitude outside our current capabilities , but that does n’t mean they ’ll always be unworkable . The report suggests we could startle attempt to do this with pocket-sized glaciers and scale up from there .
“ The specific designs that we looked at are nowhere near being ready for implementation , and we are not advocate that glacial geoengineering begin any time soon , ” Wolovick said . “ What we are recommend instead is the beginning of a appendage of reiterative design improvement . ”

“ While this undertaking still adjoin on the side of fantasy , someday it may be our only alternative reality , ” Andrea Dutton , a geologist at the University of Florida , told Earther . “ It will be a bunch easier to write out discharge than to do this — we have the technology in place and lie with what we need to do . At the oddment of the day process only the symptom rather than the case is not an effectual way forward . ”
The allurement of a project like this to the one thousand thousand of people living on the coast is clear , specially in humble lying islands that could becomeuninhabitable by mid - century . But it also give up a huge can of worms .
There ’s currently no form of globose government activity for this case of geoengineering task . It opens up questions of fairness . Do we spend our money doing this to protect the coasts while the West burns to a frizzly or the Sahel part of Africa gets consume by the Sahara ? How do we resolve which glacier — which each impart different amounts local ocean level riseowing to weird planetary physics — to modify first once we play out the kinks ? Should it be ones that keep those most in pauperization , or those with the most money to fund the project ? Where the hell is the money going to come from in any case ? ( The investigator give the side eye to the U.S. military budget , which fair . )

Further research and discussion is essential to serve those questions . We ’re running out of time to cut emissions and stave off the worst impact of clime change , making geoengineering more potential . But we ask to love at what cost .
Antarcticaice on tenuous methamphetamine hydrochloride
Daily Newsletter
Get the near tech , science , and culture news in your inbox daily .
word from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like











![]()